Austria vs Romania: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Austria
28.5%
in 2019
Romania
29.3%
in 2019
Austria rank
43rd
Romania rank
41st
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Austria
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 29.3% against 28.5% in Austria, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Austria ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 41st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.8% | 6.7% | 1.9% | Romania |
| 2000s | 14.5% | 13.5% | 1.1% | Austria |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 24.0% | 1.2% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Austria or Romania?
- Romania, at 29.3% against 28.5% in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Austria and Romania?
- 0.8%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Romania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Romania rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Austria ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 41st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.