Armenia vs Malawi: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Armenia
9.1%
in 2019
Malawi
9.3%
in 2019
Armenia rank
158th
Malawi rank
156th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Armenia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 9.3% against 9.1% in Armenia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 158th and Malawi ranks 156th of 193 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.6% | 1.4% | 2.3% | Armenia |
| 2000s | 6.4% | 2.1% | 4.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 8.5% | 5.8% | 2.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Armenia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 9.3% against 9.1% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Armenia and Malawi?
- 0.2%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Malawi?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Malawi rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Armenia ranks 158th and Malawi ranks 156th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.