AMR vs United States: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
AMR
37.3%
in 2019
United States
49.0%
in 2019
AMR rank
2nd
United States rank
5th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- AMR
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 49.0% against 37.3% in AMR, a difference of 11.7%.
That makes United States's figure about 1.3 times AMR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 2nd and United States ranks 5th of 17 groups.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.6% | 30.1% | 12.5% | United States |
| 2000s | 27.4% | 45.6% | 18.1% | United States |
| 2010s | 35.8% | 51.8% | 15.9% | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), AMR or United States?
- United States, at 49.0% against 37.3% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between AMR and United States?
- 11.7%, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and United States?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AMR and United States rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- AMR ranks 2nd and United States ranks 5th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.