AFR vs Slovakia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
AFR
10.9%
in 2019
Slovakia
36.1%
in 2019
AFR rank
15th
Slovakia rank
14th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- AFR
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 36.1% against 10.9% in AFR, a difference of 25.2%.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 3.3 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 15th and Slovakia ranks 14th of 17 groups.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.3% | 9.0% | 6.6% | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 4.1% | 18.4% | 14.3% | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 30.9% | 22.6% | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), AFR or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 36.1% against 10.9% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between AFR and Slovakia?
- 25.2%, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Slovakia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Slovakia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- AFR ranks 15th and Slovakia ranks 14th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.