AFR vs Czechia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
AFR
10.9%
in 2019
Czechia
37.6%
in 2019
AFR rank
15th
Czechia rank
13th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- AFR
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 37.6% against 10.9% in AFR, a difference of 26.7%.
That makes Czechia's figure about 3.4 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 15th and Czechia ranks 13th of 17 groups.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.3% | 10.1% | 7.8% | Czechia |
| 2000s | 4.1% | 21.1% | 16.9% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 32.9% | 24.6% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), AFR or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 37.6% against 10.9% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between AFR and Czechia?
- 26.7%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Czechia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Czechia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- AFR ranks 15th and Czechia ranks 13th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.