AFR vs Barbados: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
AFR
10.9%
in 2019
Barbados
35.4%
in 2019
AFR rank
15th
Barbados rank
16th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- AFR
- Barbados
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 35.4% against 10.9% in AFR, a difference of 24.5%.
That makes Barbados's figure about 3.2 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 15th and Barbados ranks 16th of 17 groups.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.3% | 11.6% | 9.2% | Barbados |
| 2000s | 4.1% | 22.1% | 17.9% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 32.7% | 24.4% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), AFR or Barbados?
- Barbados, at 35.4% against 10.9% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between AFR and Barbados?
- 24.5%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Barbados?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Barbados rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- AFR ranks 15th and Barbados ranks 16th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.