Afghanistan vs Naoero: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Afghanistan
14.1%
in 2019
Naoero
14.2%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
118th
Naoero rank
117th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Afghanistan
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 14.2% against 14.1% in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 118th and Naoero ranks 117th of 193 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4% | 8.0% | 3.5% | Naoero |
| 2000s | 8.1% | 10.0% | 1.9% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 12.7% | 0.4% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Afghanistan or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 14.2% against 14.1% in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Afghanistan and Naoero?
- 0.1%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Naoero?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Naoero rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Afghanistan ranks 118th and Naoero ranks 117th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.