Nauru vs South Africa: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Nauru
51.6%
in 2019
South Africa
50.7%
in 2019
Nauru rank
108th
South Africa rank
111th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Nauru
- South Africa
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 51.6% against 50.7% in South Africa, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 108th and South Africa ranks 111th of 193 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.5% | 33.6% | 3.9% | Nauru |
| 2000s | 41.3% | 39.6% | 1.8% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 48.4% | 47.0% | 1.3% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Nauru or South Africa?
- Nauru, at 51.6% against 50.7% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Nauru and South Africa?
- 0.9%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and South Africa?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Nauru and South Africa rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Nauru ranks 108th and South Africa ranks 111th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.