Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Namibia
48.8%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
48.2%
in 2019
Namibia rank
117th
Sri Lanka rank
120th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 48.8% against 48.2% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 120th of 193 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.2% | 27.4% | 2.9% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 35.5% | 34.9% | 0.6% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 44.5% | 44.0% | 0.5% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 48.8% against 48.2% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.6%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Namibia ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 120th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.