Malaysia vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Malaysia
48.2%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
48.2%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
120th
Sri Lanka rank
120th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Malaysia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 48.2% against 48.2% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 120th and Sri Lanka ranks 120th of 193 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.0% | 27.4% | 3.7% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 39.0% | 34.9% | 4.1% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 46.0% | 44.0% | 2.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Malaysia or Sri Lanka?
- Malaysia, at 48.2% against 48.2% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Malaysia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Malaysia ranks 120th and Sri Lanka ranks 120th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.