Malaysia vs Namibia: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Malaysia
48.2%
in 2019
Namibia
48.8%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
120th
Namibia rank
117th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Malaysia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 48.8% against 48.2% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 117th of 193 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.0% | 30.2% | 0.8% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 39.0% | 35.5% | 3.5% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 46.0% | 44.5% | 1.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Malaysia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 48.8% against 48.2% in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Malaysia and Namibia?
- 0.6%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Namibia rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Malaysia ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 117th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.