El Salvador vs SEAR: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
El Salvador
73.4%
in 2019
SEAR
39.0%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
14th
SEAR rank
15th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- El Salvador
- SEAR
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 73.4% against 39.0% in SEAR, a difference of 34.4%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.9 times SEAR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 14th and SEAR ranks 15th of 193 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.6% | 20.1% | 35.5% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 61.0% | 26.4% | 34.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 70.1% | 34.9% | 35.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, El Salvador or SEAR?
- El Salvador, at 73.4% against 39.0% in SEAR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between El Salvador and SEAR?
- 34.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and SEAR?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and SEAR rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- El Salvador ranks 14th and SEAR ranks 15th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.