Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Moldova: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Bosnia and Herzegovina
60.6%
in 2019
Moldova
60.9%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
74th
Moldova rank
72nd
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 60.9% against 60.6% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Moldova ranks 72nd of 193 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39.4% | 42.8% | 3.4% | Moldova |
| 2000s | 47.9% | 51.0% | 3.2% | Moldova |
| 2010s | 56.5% | 58.0% | 1.4% | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 60.9% against 60.6% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Moldova?
- 0.3%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Moldova?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Moldova rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Moldova ranks 72nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.