AFR vs Malta: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AFR
40.0%
in 2019
Malta
74.9%
in 2019
AFR rank
13th
Malta rank
10th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AFR
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 74.9% against 40.0% in AFR, a difference of 34.9%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.9 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 13th and Malta ranks 10th of 17 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.8% | 54.0% | 32.2% | Malta |
| 2000s | 25.5% | 62.7% | 37.2% | Malta |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 72.1% | 37.7% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AFR or Malta?
- Malta, at 74.9% against 40.0% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AFR and Malta?
- 34.9%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Malta?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Malta rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AFR ranks 13th and Malta ranks 10th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.