AFR vs El Salvador: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AFR
40.0%
in 2019
El Salvador
73.4%
in 2019
AFR rank
13th
El Salvador rank
14th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AFR
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 73.4% against 40.0% in AFR, a difference of 33.4%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.8 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 14th of 17 groups.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.8% | 55.6% | 33.8% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 25.5% | 61.0% | 35.5% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 70.1% | 35.7% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AFR or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 73.4% against 40.0% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AFR and El Salvador?
- 33.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and El Salvador?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and El Salvador rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AFR ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 14th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.