Nicaragua vs Romania: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Nicaragua
67.2%
in 2019
Romania
67.8%
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
31st
Romania rank
28th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Nicaragua
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 67.8% against 67.2% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 31st and Romania ranks 28th of 193 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.5% | 50.5% | 1.0% | Romania |
| 2000s | 54.6% | 57.4% | 2.8% | Romania |
| 2010s | 63.8% | 64.6% | 0.8% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Nicaragua or Romania?
- Romania, at 67.8% against 67.2% in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Nicaragua and Romania?
- 0.6%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Romania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Romania rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Nicaragua ranks 31st and Romania ranks 28th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.