Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Malaysia
49.5%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
47.7%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
127th
Zimbabwe rank
129th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 49.5% against 47.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.8%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 129th of 193 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.8% | 28.1% | 4.6% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 41.0% | 33.8% | 7.2% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 47.5% | 43.1% | 4.4% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Malaysia, at 49.5% against 47.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 1.8%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Malaysia ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 129th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.