Malawi vs Timor-Leste: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Malawi
37.7%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
37.4%
in 2019
Malawi rank
171st
Timor-Leste rank
173rd
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Malawi
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 37.7% against 37.4% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Malawi ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 173rd of 193 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.9% | 22.9% | 6.0% | Timor-Leste |
| 2000s | 21.1% | 29.0% | 7.9% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 30.9% | 35.2% | 4.3% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Malawi or Timor-Leste?
- Malawi, at 37.7% against 37.4% in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Malawi and Timor-Leste?
- 0.3%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Timor-Leste?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Timor-Leste rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Malawi ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 173rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.