Japan vs Mauritius: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Japan
66.8%
in 2019
Mauritius
66.6%
in 2019
Japan rank
34th
Mauritius rank
35th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Japan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Japan currently reports 66.8% against 66.6% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Japan ranks 34th and Mauritius ranks 35th of 193 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.7% | 43.6% | 1.0% | Japan |
| 2000s | 55.7% | 50.5% | 5.3% | Japan |
| 2010s | 64.1% | 61.0% | 3.1% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Japan or Mauritius?
- Japan, at 66.8% against 66.6% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Japan and Mauritius?
- 0.2%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritius?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Mauritius rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Japan ranks 34th and Mauritius ranks 35th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.