Iceland vs Sur: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Iceland
82.4%
in 2019
Sur
63.8%
in 2019
Iceland rank
2nd
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Iceland
- Sur
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 82.4% against 63.8% in Sur, a difference of 18.6%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.0% | 48.1% | 15.8% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 74.2% | 55.7% | 18.5% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 81.2% | 62.2% | 18.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Iceland or Sur?
- Iceland, at 82.4% against 63.8% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Iceland and Sur?
- 18.6%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Sur rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Iceland ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.