Iceland vs Mus: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults … age-standardized
Iceland
82.4%
in 2019
Mus
66.6%
in 2019
Iceland rank
2nd
Mus rank
1st
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults … age-standardized over time
- Iceland
- Mus
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 82.4% against 66.6% in Mus, a difference of 15.8%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Mus's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 2nd and Mus ranks 1st of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.0% | 43.6% | 20.4% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 74.2% | 50.5% | 23.7% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 81.2% | 61.0% | 20.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Iceland or Mus?
- Iceland, at 82.4% against 66.6% in Mus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Iceland and Mus?
- 15.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mus?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Mus rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Iceland ranks 2nd and Mus ranks 1st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.