Costa Rica vs Sur: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Costa Rica
77.0%
in 2019
Sur
63.8%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
5th
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Costa Rica
- Sur
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 77.0% against 63.8% in Sur, a difference of 13.2%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57.7% | 48.1% | 9.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 63.1% | 55.7% | 7.4% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 73.3% | 62.2% | 11.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Costa Rica or Sur?
- Costa Rica, at 77.0% against 63.8% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Costa Rica and Sur?
- 13.2%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Sur rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Costa Rica ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.