Bhutan vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Bhutan
46.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
46.6%
in 2019
Bhutan rank
136th
Sri Lanka rank
133rd
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Bhutan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 46.6% against 46.0% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 136th and Sri Lanka ranks 133rd of 193 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.7% | 28.0% | 0.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 34.6% | 35.3% | 0.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 42.5% | 43.3% | 0.8% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Bhutan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 46.6% against 46.0% in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Bhutan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.6%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Bhutan ranks 136th and Sri Lanka ranks 133rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.