AMR vs Iceland: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AMR
69.8%
in 2019
Iceland
82.4%
in 2019
AMR rank
1st
Iceland rank
2nd
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AMR
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 82.4% against 69.8% in AMR, a difference of 12.6%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times AMR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 2nd of 17 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.2% | 64.0% | 5.8% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 63.4% | 74.2% | 10.8% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 81.2% | 12.5% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AMR or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 82.4% against 69.8% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AMR and Iceland?
- 12.6%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Iceland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Iceland rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AMR ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 2nd of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.