AMR vs Canada: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AMR
69.8%
in 2019
Canada
77.8%
in 2019
AMR rank
1st
Canada rank
4th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AMR
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 77.8% against 69.8% in AMR, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times AMR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 1st and Canada ranks 4th of 17 groups.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.2% | 61.7% | 3.6% | Canada |
| 2000s | 63.4% | 74.4% | 11.0% | Canada |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 78.8% | 10.1% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AMR or Canada?
- Canada, at 77.8% against 69.8% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AMR and Canada?
- 8.0%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Canada?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Canada rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AMR ranks 1st and Canada ranks 4th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.