AFR vs Chile: Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AFR
42.5%
in 2019
Chile
71.2%
in 2019
AFR rank
13th
Chile rank
14th
Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AFR
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 71.2% against 42.5% in AFR, a difference of 28.7%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.7 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 13th and Chile ranks 14th of 17 groups.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.8% | 56.6% | 33.8% | Chile |
| 2000s | 27.1% | 64.7% | 37.7% | Chile |
| 2010s | 36.7% | 70.1% | 33.4% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AFR or Chile?
- Chile, at 71.2% against 42.5% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AFR and Chile?
- 28.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Chile?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Chile rank globally for hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AFR ranks 13th and Chile ranks 14th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.