New Zealand vs Norway: Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude
New Zealand
36
in 2019
Norway
36.3
in 2019
New Zealand rank
105th
Norway rank
103rd
Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude over time
- New Zealand
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 36.3 against 36 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.3.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 105th and Norway ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.13 | 42.35 | 7.22 | Norway |
| 2000s | 34.91 | 39.77 | 4.86 | Norway |
| 2010s | 35.97 | 37.62 | 1.65 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude, New Zealand or Norway?
- Norway, at 36.3 against 36 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude between New Zealand and Norway?
- 0.3, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude?
- New Zealand ranks 105th and Norway ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.