Kiribati vs Namibia: Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude
Kiribati
40.5
in 2019
Namibia
40.3
in 2019
Kiribati rank
60th
Namibia rank
63rd
Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude over time
- Kiribati
- Namibia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 40.5 against 40.3 in Namibia, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 193 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.25 | 38.32 | 11.07 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 28.3 | 40.95 | 12.65 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 36.31 | 41.44 | 5.13 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude, Kiribati or Namibia?
- Kiribati, at 40.5 against 40.3 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude between Kiribati and Namibia?
- 0.2, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Namibia rank globally for hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude?
- Kiribati ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.