Chile vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude
Chile
38.4
in 2019
Sri Lanka
37.9
in 2019
Chile rank
77th
Sri Lanka rank
80th
Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude over time
- Chile
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Chile currently reports 38.4 against 37.9 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.5.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 77th and Sri Lanka ranks 80th of 193 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.74 | 29.8 | 5.94 | Chile |
| 2000s | 39.07 | 31.63 | 7.44 | Chile |
| 2010s | 39.31 | 35.5 | 3.81 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude, Chile or Sri Lanka?
- Chile, at 38.4 against 37.9 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude between Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 0.5, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude?
- Chile ranks 77th and Sri Lanka ranks 80th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.