Sri Lanka vs Timor-Leste: Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence
Sri Lanka
35.6
in 2019
Timor-Leste
35.3
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
119th
Timor-Leste rank
120th
Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence over time
- Sri Lanka
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 35.6 against 35.3 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 119th and Timor-Leste ranks 120th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.75 | 29.98 | 1.77 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 32.37 | 32.48 | 0.11 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 34.44 | 34.47 | 0.03 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, Sri Lanka or Timor-Leste?
- Sri Lanka, at 35.6 against 35.3 in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence between Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste?
- 0.3, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste rank globally for hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence?
- Sri Lanka ranks 119th and Timor-Leste ranks 120th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.