AFR vs Romania: Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence
AFR
35.5
in 2019
Romania
48.4
in 2019
AFR rank
3rd
Romania rank
6th
Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence over time
- AFR
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 48.4 against 35.5 in AFR, a difference of 12.9.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times AFR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 3rd and Romania ranks 6th of 11 groups.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.96 | 47.34 | 12.38 | Romania |
| 2000s | 36.62 | 46.61 | 9.99 | Romania |
| 2010s | 36.44 | 47.87 | 11.43 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, AFR or Romania?
- Romania, at 48.4 against 35.5 in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence between AFR and Romania?
- 12.9, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Romania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Romania rank globally for hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence?
- AFR ranks 3rd and Romania ranks 6th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, age-standardized. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.