Mus vs Tanzania: HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary … primary, 9-14
Mus
87.0%
in 2025
Tanzania
99.0%
in 2025
Mus rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary … primary, 9-14 over time
- Mus
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 99.0% against 87.0% in Mus, a difference of 12.0%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Mus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mus ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 2 regions.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mus averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.5% | 62.0% | 21.5% | Mus |
| 2020s | 73.7% | 87.3% | 13.7% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hpv immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14), Mus or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 99.0% against 87.0% in Mus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in hpv immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14) between Mus and Tanzania?
- 12.0%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Tanzania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
- How do Mus and Tanzania rank globally for hpv immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14)?
- Mus ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14 years old girls) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.