AMR vs Niue: HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14)
AMR
71.0%
in 2025
Niue
99.0%
in 2025
AMR rank
1st
Niue rank
1st
HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14) over time
- AMR
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 99.0% against 71.0% in AMR, a difference of 28.0%.
That makes Niue's figure about 1.4 times AMR's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 1st and Niue ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hpv immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14), AMR or Niue?
- Niue, at 99.0% against 71.0% in AMR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in hpv immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14) between AMR and Niue?
- 28.0%, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Niue?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do AMR and Niue rank globally for hpv immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14)?
- AMR ranks 1st and Niue ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14 years old girls) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.