Burkina Faso vs Central African Republic: HIV positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using

Burkina Faso
34.0%
in 2011
Central African Republic
41.0%
in 2011
Burkina Faso rank
23rd
Central African Republic rank
21st

HIV positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Central African Republic
010203040200420072011

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 41.0% against 34.0% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 7.0%.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 23rd and Central African Republic ranks 21st of 38 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Central African Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 12.6% 15.6% 3.0% Central African Republic
2010s 34.0% 41.0% 7.0% Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hiv positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using, Burkina Faso or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 41.0% against 34.0% in Burkina Faso as of 2011.
What is the difference in hiv positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using between Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
7.0%, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
How do Burkina Faso and Central African Republic rank globally for hiv positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using?
Burkina Faso ranks 23rd and Central African Republic ranks 21st of 38 countries.
Where does this data come from?
http://data.unaids.org/pub/GlobalReport/2008/, published as HIV positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using WHO/UNAIDS methodology (%; low estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Central African Republic: HIV positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using. Statizoid, drawing on http://data.unaids.org/pub/GlobalReport/2008/. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/hiv-positive-pregnant-women-receiving-antiretrovirals-using-who-unaids-methodology-2/burkina-faso/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/hiv-positive-pregnant-women-receiving-antiretrovirals-using-who-unaids-methodology-2/burkina-faso/central-african-republic/">Burkina Faso vs Central African Republic: HIV positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
HIV positive pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals, using WHO/UNAIDS methodology (%; low estimate)
Unit
%; low estimate
Source
http://data.unaids.org/pub/GlobalReport/2008/
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
38 places, 216 data points, 2004–2011
Last refreshed

Percentage of HIV-infected pregnant women who received antiretrovirals to reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission. Numerator: Number of HIV-infected pregnant women who received antiretrovirals during the last 12 months to reduce mother-to-child transmission. Denominator: Estimated number of HIV-infected pregnant women in the last 12 months. Ranges are presented for countries with low and concentrated epidemics. The purpose of this indicator is to assess progress in preventing vertical transmission of HIV. All data reflect values representing 12 month period ending December 2007 which have been reconciled between reporting country and UNAIDS/WHO/UNICEF, unless otherwise noted. All analysis of this indicator, including quoted country figures, reflect numerators which have gone through a tri agency reconciliation (UNAIDS/WHO/UNICEF) process and denominators which have been estimated directly from the UNAIDS/WHO Reference group on Estimates, Modelling and Projections methodology (Spectrum). The reconciliation process ensured all agencies reported the same country endorsed figure which was the most recent and met the definition of HIV-infected women receiving antiretroviral drugs over the last 12 months, and thus reflect a full year. Every effort was made in cases of discrepancy across the three agencies to obtain approval from the country on a final indicator value.