Naoero vs South Africa: Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)
Naoero
66.0%
in 2025
South Africa
65.0%
in 2025
Naoero rank
170th
South Africa rank
172nd
Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) over time
- Naoero
- South Africa
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 66.0% against 65.0% in South Africa, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.
Naoero ranks 170th and South Africa ranks 172nd of 194 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.9% | 75.9% | 10.0% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 92.0% | 79.6% | 12.4% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 85.2% | 78.8% | 6.3% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hepatitis b (hepb3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%), Naoero or South Africa?
- Naoero, at 66.0% against 65.0% in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in hepatitis b (hepb3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) between Naoero and South Africa?
- 1.0%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Naoero and South Africa rank globally for hepatitis b (hepb3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)?
- Naoero ranks 170th and South Africa ranks 172nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.