Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)
Mauritius
96.0%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
96.0%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
40th
Sri Lanka rank
40th
Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 96.0% against 96.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 40th and Sri Lanka ranks 40th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.2% | 58.4% | 36.8% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 94.9% | 99.0% | 4.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 95.0% | 97.0% | 2.0% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hepatitis b (hepb3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%), Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritius, at 96.0% against 96.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in hepatitis b (hepb3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for hepatitis b (hepb3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)?
- Mauritius ranks 40th and Sri Lanka ranks 40th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.