Honduras vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Coverage of essential health services
Honduras
64
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
64
in 2023
Honduras rank
131st
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
131st
Coverage of essential health services over time
- Honduras
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 64 against 64 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 131st and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 131st of 193 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.9 | 39.3 | 17.6 | Honduras |
| 2010s | 61.6 | 53.4 | 8.2 | Honduras |
| 2020s | 64.25 | 61.25 | 3 | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of essential health services, Honduras or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Honduras, at 64 against 64 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coverage of essential health services between Honduras and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for coverage of essential health services?
- Honduras ranks 131st and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 131st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Universal Health Coverage Dataset, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Coverage of essential health services. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of essential health services is measured as an index on a scale of 0 to 100 (where higher is better). This index is based on risk-standardized death rates – which give a measure of healthcare access and quality – and whether common interventions are carried out.