Australia vs New Zealand: Coverage of essential health services
Australia
89
in 2023
New Zealand
89
in 2023
Australia rank
3rd
New Zealand rank
3rd
Coverage of essential health services over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Australia currently reports 89 against 89 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 193 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.9 | 83.8 | 2.1 | Australia |
| 2010s | 88.8 | 88.2 | 0.6 | Australia |
| 2020s | 89 | 89 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of essential health services, Australia or New Zealand?
- Australia, at 89 against 89 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coverage of essential health services between Australia and New Zealand?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for coverage of essential health services?
- Australia ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Universal Health Coverage Dataset, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Coverage of essential health services. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of essential health services is measured as an index on a scale of 0 to 100 (where higher is better). This index is based on risk-standardized death rates – which give a measure of healthcare access and quality – and whether common interventions are carried out.