Malta vs New Zealand: Health worker density, by type of occupation
Malta
5.29
in 2023
New Zealand
5.17
in 2024
Malta rank
63rd
New Zealand rank
67th
Health worker density, by type of occupation over time
- Malta
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.29 against 5.17 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
Malta ranks 63rd and New Zealand ranks 67th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.24 | 4.14 | 0.097 | Malta |
| 2010s | 4.63 | 6.09 | 1.46 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 5.19 | 5.03 | 0.16 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher health worker density, by type of occupation, Malta or New Zealand?
- Malta, at 5.29 against 5.17 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in health worker density, by type of occupation between Malta and New Zealand?
- 0.12, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for health worker density, by type of occupation?
- Malta ranks 63rd and New Zealand ranks 67th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Health worker density, by type of occupation (per 10,000 population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.