Micronesia (country) vs Namibia: Healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending
Micronesia (country)
65
in 2023
Namibia
66
in 2023
Micronesia (country) rank
127th
Namibia rank
125th
Healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 66 against 65 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 125th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.2 | 53.4 | 4.2 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 62.1 | 58.7 | 3.4 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2020s | 64.75 | 63.25 | 1.5 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending, Micronesia (country) or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 66 against 65 in Micronesia (country) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending between Micronesia (country) and Namibia?
- 1, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Namibia rank globally for healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 125th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Universal Health Coverage Dataset, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Universal healthcare coverage (UHC) service coverage is measured on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) based on the average coverage of essential healthcare services.