Belarus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending
Belarus
80
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
80
in 2023
Belarus rank
51st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
51st
Healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending over time
- Belarus
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 80 against 80 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Belarus ranks 51st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.4 | 76.4 | 5 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 77.6 | 78.5 | 0.9 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 80 | 79.75 | 0.25 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending, Belarus or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Belarus, at 80 against 80 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending between Belarus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending?
- Belarus ranks 51st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Universal Health Coverage Dataset, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Healthcare coverage by level of healthcare spending. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Universal healthcare coverage (UHC) service coverage is measured on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) based on the average coverage of essential healthcare services.