Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Financial hardship in health and components (SDG 3.8.2, 2025)
Belarus
13.8%
in 2016
Sri Lanka
14.2%
in 2019
Belarus rank
31st
Sri Lanka rank
29th
Financial hardship in health and components (SDG 3.8.2, 2025) over time
- Belarus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 14.2% against 13.8% in Belarus, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 31st and Sri Lanka ranks 29th of 41 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.3% | 23.6% | 1.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 14.8% | 19.0% | 4.2% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial hardship in health and components (sdg 3.8.2, 2025), Belarus or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 14.2% against 13.8% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in financial hardship in health and components (sdg 3.8.2, 2025) between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for financial hardship in health and components (sdg 3.8.2, 2025)?
- Belarus ranks 31st and Sri Lanka ranks 29th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Financial hardship in health and components (SDG 3.8.2, 2025 definition): population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.