Malaysia vs Norway: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- Malaysia
- Norway
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Malaysia ranks 148th and Norway ranks 150th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, Malaysia or Norway?
- Malaysia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between Malaysia and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for external health expenditure?
- Malaysia ranks 148th and Norway ranks 150th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.