IDA only vs South Sudan: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- IDA only
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 62.3% against 20.4% in IDA only, a difference of 41.9%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 3.1 times IDA only's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA only ranks 6th and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 42 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.5% | 54.6% | 36.1% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 19.8% | 50.8% | 31.1% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, IDA only or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 62.3% against 20.4% in IDA only as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between IDA only and South Sudan?
- 41.9%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do IDA only and South Sudan rank globally for external health expenditure?
- IDA only ranks 6th and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.