IDA blend vs Uganda: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- IDA blend
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 44.1% against 11.4% in IDA blend, a difference of 32.7%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 3.8 times IDA blend's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 10th of 42 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.1% | 29.3% | 22.1% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 10.4% | 42.8% | 32.3% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 10.7% | 45.5% | 34.8% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, IDA blend or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 44.1% against 11.4% in IDA blend as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between IDA blend and Uganda?
- 32.7%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Uganda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do IDA blend and Uganda rank globally for external health expenditure?
- IDA blend ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 10th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.