Congo vs Naoero: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- Congo
- Naoero
How they compare
Congo currently reports 14.9% against 13.4% in Naoero, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Naoero's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 48th and Naoero ranks 51st of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.1% | 19.6% | 4.5% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 24.7% | 10.6% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 11.8% | 11.7% | 0.1% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, Congo or Naoero?
- Congo, at 14.9% against 13.4% in Naoero as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between Congo and Naoero?
- 1.5%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Naoero?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Naoero rank globally for external health expenditure?
- Congo ranks 48th and Naoero ranks 51st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.