Chile vs North Macedonia: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 150th and North Macedonia ranks 147th of 177 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.2% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.6% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, Chile or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Chile as of 2018.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0.0%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for external health expenditure?
- Chile ranks 150th and North Macedonia ranks 147th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.