Cambodia vs Namibia: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- Cambodia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 11.4% against 11.3% in Cambodia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 58th and Namibia ranks 56th of 177 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.9% | 13.2% | 0.7% | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 7.8% | 4.6% | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 11.1% | 7.9% | 3.2% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, Cambodia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 11.4% against 11.3% in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between Cambodia and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Namibia rank globally for external health expenditure?
- Cambodia ranks 58th and Namibia ranks 56th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.