Burundi vs Malawi: External health expenditure
External health expenditure over time
- Burundi
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 65.5% against 57.4% in Burundi, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Burundi ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.9% | 54.2% | 28.3% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 42.3% | 60.8% | 18.5% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 53.6% | 61.5% | 7.8% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure, Burundi or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 65.5% against 57.4% in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure between Burundi and Malawi?
- 8.1%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for external health expenditure?
- Burundi ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from external sources. External sources compose of direct foreign transfers and foreign transfers distributed by government encompassing all financial inflows into the national health system from outside the country. External sources either flow through the government scheme or are channeled through non-governmental organizations or other schemes.