AMR vs Nepal: Estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among children
AMR
48
in 2025
Nepal
87
in 2025
AMR rank
4th
Nepal rank
3rd
Estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among children over time
- AMR
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 87 against 48 in AMR, a difference of 39.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.8 times AMR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 4th and Nepal ranks 3rd of 7 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AMR averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.5 | 4 | 7.5 | AMR |
| 2010s | 38 | 58.5 | 20.5 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 44.67 | 84.17 | 39.5 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among children, AMR or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 87 against 48 in AMR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among children between AMR and Nepal?
- 39, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do AMR and Nepal rank globally for estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among children?
- AMR ranks 4th and Nepal ranks 3rd of 7 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among children. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.